Radboud Annals of Medical Students

RAMS

  • Home
  • News
    • Newsletter archive
  • About
    • RAMS
    • The Board
      • The General Board
        • The General Board (2021-2022)
        • Previous General Boards
      • The Editorial Board
        • The Editorial Board (2021-2022)
        • Previous Editorial Boards
    • The Supervisory Board
    • Reviewers and Editors
    • RAMS Committees
      • Symposium Committee
      • Masterclass Committee
  • Editions
    • 2021-2022
      • Twentieth Edition – September 2021
      • Twentyfirst Edition – December 2021
      • Twenty second Edition – March 2022
    • 2020-2021
      • Sixteenth edition – September 2020
      • Seventeenth edition – December 2020
      • Eighteenth edition – March 2021
      • Nineteenth Edition – June 2021
    • 2019-2020
      • Fourteenth edition – December 2019
      • Fifteenth edition – April 2020
      • Sixteenth edition – September 2020
    • 2018-2019
      • Eleventh Edition – September 2018
      • Twelfth Edition – January 2019
      • Thirteenth edition – May 2019
    • 2017 – 2018
      • Ninth Edition – November 2017
      • Tenth Edition – February 2018
    • 2016-2017
      • Sixth Edition – November 2016
      • Seventh Edition – March 2017
      • Eighth Edition – July 2017
    • 2015-2016
      • Third Edition – November 2015
      • Fourth Edition – March 2016
      • Fifth Edition – June 2016
    • 2014-2015
      • Pilot Edition – June 2014
      • First Edition – January 2015
      • Second Edition – June 2015
  • For Authors
    • Submit your Article
    • Research internship
  • For Supervisors
  • For Reviewers
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
Je bent hier: Home / News / When left is emotionally right

When left is emotionally right

9 september 2019 by Rams

Mylène Gorissen 

As you are probably all aware of, people have a favour for using either their right or their left hand. This is the result of lateralisation (division) of the brain in two hemispheres, with each its own distinct functions. However, what most of you probably are not aware of is that there is also a lateralisation in the way humans carry their new-born children. Decades of research shows that mothers prefer to carry their baby on the left side of their body using their left arm [1]. It is still unknown which factors determine the development of this asymmetry of the nervous system, but there are several theories explaining the lateralisation of cradling a child [1].

The first to study lateralisation in cradling was Salk in 1960. He found a general left-side bias across almost three hundred tested mothers: 83% of them cradled on the left body side, irrespective of their preferred hand side [1]. He concluded that by carrying a baby on the left body side, the child is able to hear it’s mother’s heartbeat because of the anatomical location of the heart. Nonetheless, the heartbeat hypothesis may be inconclusive, since a case-study performed in a mother with her heart on the right body side (a congenital condition called dextrocardia) showed that she also carried her child on the left side of the body [2].  

Two other major hypotheses were generated to explain the leftward asymmetry in cradling. The first being emotional bias, the second being motor bias [1, 3]. The emotional bias hypothesis explains the asymmetry of cradling by the fact that emotional processing takes place mainly in the right hemisphere [1]. Parents prefer to hold the child in their left visual field, which is projected onto the right hemisphere [1]. This effect seems to be associated with the child’s age, because in mothers, the strongest preference to hold the baby on the left is being found directly after birth [2]. This bias decreases after 12 weeks. The idea is that when the baby is born, mothers may have a stronger left-side bias driven by emotions [2]. As the baby ages, mothers start to multitask. This brings us to the second hypothesis, namely the motor bias hypothesis. From an evolutionary perspective, a leftward cradling bias may lead to a natural selection of right-handedness, because this allows mothers to multitask while carrying their baby [2]. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis on this topic describes that males are less left-lateralized during infant holding compared to women [1]. This could be explained by the emotional bond mothers have with their new-born children. Moreover, the emotional and motor hypotheses may be connected with each other, as the emotional state seems to alter the side of embraces [4]. In a study by Packheiser et al., participants performed more left-sided embraces in emotional situations like reunions and farewells, compared to more neutral situations like greetings [4]. So, when socializing, if you are doubting which way to go, left is emotionally right.

 

[1]  Packheiser, J., et al. Handedness and sex effects on lateral biases in human cradling: Three meta-analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 104, 30-42 (2019).

[2] Todd, B. & Butterworth, G. Her heart is in the right place: an investigation of the ‘heartbeat hypothesis’ as an explanation of the left side cradling preference in a mother with dextrocardia. Early Dev. Parent. 7, 229-233 (1998).

[3] Ocklenburg, S., et al. Hugs and kisses – The role of motor preferences and emotional lateralization for hemispheric asymmetries in human social touch. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 95, 353-360 (2018).

[4] Packheiser, J., et al. Embracing your emotions: affective state impacts lateralisation of human embraces. Psychol Res 83, 26-36 (2019).

Categorie: News, Uncategorized

RAMS Newsletter

RAMS complies to the GDPR. By submitting your e-mail address to us you agree with our Privacy Policy.

Social Media


Sponsors & Partners

  • Brian Gardner
  • Lauren Mancke
  • Nathan Rice
  • Nick Croft
  • Rafal Tomal
  • Ron Rennick
© Copyright 2014 RADBOUD ANNALS OF MEDICAL STUDENTS · All Rights Reserved · Powered by PLatform11
Beheer cookie toestemming

Om de beste ervaringen te bieden, gebruiken wij technologieën zoals cookies om informatie over je apparaat op te slaan en/of te raadplegen. Door in te stemmen met deze technologieën kunnen wij gegevens zoals surfgedrag of unieke ID's op deze site verwerken. Als je geen toestemming geeft of uw toestemming intrekt, kan dit een nadelige invloed hebben op bepaalde functies en mogelijkheden.

Functioneel Altijd actief
De technische opslag of toegang is strikt noodzakelijk voor het legitieme doel het gebruik mogelijk te maken van een specifieke dienst waarom de abonnee of gebruiker uitdrukkelijk heeft gevraagd, of met als enig doel de uitvoering van de transmissie van een communicatie over een elektronisch communicatienetwerk.
Voorkeuren
De technische opslag of toegang is noodzakelijk voor het legitieme doel voorkeuren op te slaan die niet door de abonnee of gebruiker zijn aangevraagd.
Statistieken
De technische opslag of toegang die uitsluitend voor statistische doeleinden wordt gebruikt. De technische opslag of toegang die uitsluitend wordt gebruikt voor anonieme statistische doeleinden. Zonder dagvaarding, vrijwillige naleving door uw Internet Service Provider, of aanvullende gegevens van een derde partij, kan informatie die alleen voor dit doel wordt opgeslagen of opgehaald gewoonlijk niet worden gebruikt om je te identificeren.
Marketing
De technische opslag of toegang is nodig om gebruikersprofielen op te stellen voor het verzenden van reclame, of om de gebruiker op een website of over verschillende websites te volgen voor soortgelijke marketingdoeleinden.
Beheer opties Beheer diensten Beheer leveranciers Lees meer over deze doeleinden
Bekijk voorkeuren
{title} {title} {title}