Members of the reviewer pool assess submitted scientific papers. Based on their review report, a paper is accepted for publication (if necessary with minor or major revisions) or rejected. All reviewers have completed a series of masterclasses. The knowledge and experience of our reviewers guarantee that only high-quality and interesting papers will be published in RAMS. Would you like to be a reviewer as well? Please contact email@example.com.
Aimée de Croon, Arno Stellingwerf, Daphne Olischläger, Mejdan Gashi, Yfke Prins & Mèlanie Reijnaers
Together with the editorial board the editors are responsible for the content of RAMS. The scientific editors write their own scientific articles and the editorial editors write articles that are a bit less scientific in content and style. The articles are meant to be easier to read than scientific articles, and the editorial editors have more freedom to write in their own style and opinionated compared to the scientific articles. Of course, claims in these articles are supported by scientific literature. Finally, all members of the editorial board will gather once a month to discuss the current status of our journal.
Would you like to be an editor as well? Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Elisah Geertman, Natalie Ludwig, Thomas Nieuwenstein, Aster Witvliet, Anne Valk, Harshitha Ramu