Radboud Annals of Medical Students

RAMS

  • Home
  • News
    • Newsletter archive
  • About
    • RAMS
    • The Board
      • The General Board
        • The General Board (2021-2022)
        • Previous General Boards
      • The Editorial Board
        • The Editorial Board (2021-2022)
        • Previous Editorial Boards
    • The Supervisory Board
    • Reviewers and Editors
    • RAMS Committees
      • Symposium Committee
      • Masterclass Committee
  • Editions
    • 2021-2022
      • Twentieth Edition – September 2021
      • Twentyfirst Edition – December 2021
      • Twenty second Edition – March 2022
    • 2020-2021
      • Sixteenth edition – September 2020
      • Seventeenth edition – December 2020
      • Eighteenth edition – March 2021
      • Nineteenth Edition – June 2021
    • 2019-2020
      • Fourteenth edition – December 2019
      • Fifteenth edition – April 2020
      • Sixteenth edition – September 2020
    • 2018-2019
      • Eleventh Edition – September 2018
      • Twelfth Edition – January 2019
      • Thirteenth edition – May 2019
    • 2017 – 2018
      • Ninth Edition – November 2017
      • Tenth Edition – February 2018
    • 2016-2017
      • Sixth Edition – November 2016
      • Seventh Edition – March 2017
      • Eighth Edition – July 2017
    • 2015-2016
      • Third Edition – November 2015
      • Fourth Edition – March 2016
      • Fifth Edition – June 2016
    • 2014-2015
      • Pilot Edition – June 2014
      • First Edition – January 2015
      • Second Edition – June 2015
  • For Authors
    • Submit your Article
    • Research internship
  • For Supervisors
  • For Reviewers
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
Je bent hier: Home / News / Take the leap

Take the leap

22 april 2022 by Rams

Guus Brand

A couple of weeks ago, the decentral selection process ended in all medical faculties in the Netherlands. This is a process that I have passed through six years ago myself when I applied for medical school at Radboud University. Thousands of middle school teens apply and join in the selection process, but only 20-25 percent of them actually succeed in entering medical school. The selection is often described as difficult and stressful. So difficult that there is a booming business of crash courses decentral selection of medicine (for which the organizers charge a hefty fee, of course). Most universities have a selection process that involves a letter of motivation, a personality test, and, often most importantly, some sort of biomedical knowledge test. 

Especially this last part is where most students struggle, and it is also the test on which most students focus all their energy and attention. For me, this is somewhat strange. Is excellent biomedical knowledge the most important aspect of a good physician? In the digital age, much of what were once the secrets of the medical profession are now accessible to everyone with a computer and internet connection. Websites such as WebMD or thuisarts.nl give people access to knowledge that was once only attainable and understandable after years of hard study. Furthermore, much of the medical profession has been taken over by machines, computers, and other helpful tools. Take measuring blood pressure, for example, once a true craft to perform quickly, comfortably, and accurately. Now, in many modern hospitals, it is merely a matter of wrapping the cuff around a patient’s arm and pressing the button. Not that I am saying that these are bad advancements; the use of the internet to provide patients with information adds to the patient being informed and empowered, and technological advancements in medicine have opened up countless new possibilities. That leaves the question, however, what are the core values that make up a doctor or even any health care provider. 

For me, it is more important someone who applies for medical school or any other study or job in (health)care has a set of core values. In my opinion, the core values of any good doctor are not necessarily a perfect grasp of medical knowledge, to be able to wake up in the middle of the night and recite the Krebs cycle or the brand names of all fluoroquinolones. Biomedical background knowledge is vital and unmistakably part of every able physician, but in my opinion, it is not a core value that makes or breaks a doctor. It is something that can always be taught. Values that can not be taught, such as empathy and caring for others, are, in my opinion, core values that constitute a good healthcare worker. Sure there are universities that emphasize professionalism; at Radboud University, an entire course is dedicated to this end. But this course also focuses on behaving professionally in the workplace; it does not teach “being a good person”. Sadly, these values are hard to measure in a test and can easily be feigned. 

My point is, if you recognize yourself in the image of the ideal healthcare worker I have sketched above, do not let the results of some test hold you back. Anyone can learn the biomedical skills and knowledge required to be a doctor or nurse. You possess something that no test can measure, and no university can teach. You should be in healthcare. 

Categorie: News, Uncategorized

RAMS Newsletter

RAMS complies to the GDPR. By submitting your e-mail address to us you agree with our Privacy Policy.

Social Media


Sponsors & Partners

  • Brian Gardner
  • Lauren Mancke
  • Nathan Rice
  • Nick Croft
  • Rafal Tomal
  • Ron Rennick
© Copyright 2014 RADBOUD ANNALS OF MEDICAL STUDENTS · All Rights Reserved · Powered by PLatform11
Beheer cookie toestemming

Om de beste ervaringen te bieden, gebruiken wij technologieën zoals cookies om informatie over je apparaat op te slaan en/of te raadplegen. Door in te stemmen met deze technologieën kunnen wij gegevens zoals surfgedrag of unieke ID's op deze site verwerken. Als je geen toestemming geeft of uw toestemming intrekt, kan dit een nadelige invloed hebben op bepaalde functies en mogelijkheden.

Functioneel Altijd actief
De technische opslag of toegang is strikt noodzakelijk voor het legitieme doel het gebruik mogelijk te maken van een specifieke dienst waarom de abonnee of gebruiker uitdrukkelijk heeft gevraagd, of met als enig doel de uitvoering van de transmissie van een communicatie over een elektronisch communicatienetwerk.
Voorkeuren
De technische opslag of toegang is noodzakelijk voor het legitieme doel voorkeuren op te slaan die niet door de abonnee of gebruiker zijn aangevraagd.
Statistieken
De technische opslag of toegang die uitsluitend voor statistische doeleinden wordt gebruikt. De technische opslag of toegang die uitsluitend wordt gebruikt voor anonieme statistische doeleinden. Zonder dagvaarding, vrijwillige naleving door uw Internet Service Provider, of aanvullende gegevens van een derde partij, kan informatie die alleen voor dit doel wordt opgeslagen of opgehaald gewoonlijk niet worden gebruikt om je te identificeren.
Marketing
De technische opslag of toegang is nodig om gebruikersprofielen op te stellen voor het verzenden van reclame, of om de gebruiker op een website of over verschillende websites te volgen voor soortgelijke marketingdoeleinden.
Beheer opties Beheer diensten Beheer leveranciers Lees meer over deze doeleinden
Bekijk voorkeuren
{title} {title} {title}